Pakistan vs Uzbekistan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of)

Pakistan
30.59 billion
in 2030
Uzbekistan
49.62 billion
in 2030
Pakistan rank
12th
Uzbekistan rank
9th

Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of) over time

  • Pakistan
  • Uzbekistan
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B200020152030

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 49.62 billion against 30.59 billion in Pakistan, a difference of 19.03 billion.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.6 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 12th and Uzbekistan ranks 9th of 29 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 7.07 billion 4.43 billion 2.64 billion Pakistan
2010s 11.85 billion 23.64 billion 11.79 billion Uzbekistan
2020s 16.03 billion 42.82 billion 26.79 billion Uzbekistan
2030s 30.59 billion 49.62 billion 19.03 billion Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of), Pakistan or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 49.62 billion against 30.59 billion in Pakistan as of 2030.
What is the difference in gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of) between Pakistan and Uzbekistan?
19.03 billion, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Uzbekistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2030.
How do Pakistan and Uzbekistan rank globally for gross international reserves, central bank, us dollar (balance of)?
Pakistan ranks 12th and Uzbekistan ranks 9th of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6)). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Uzbekistan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-international-reserves-central-bank-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international/pakistan/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-international-reserves-central-bank-us-dollar-balance-of-payments-and-international/pakistan/uzbekistan/">Pakistan vs Uzbekistan: Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross international reserves, Central bank, US dollar (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, Sixth Edition (BPM6))
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
42 places, 1,258 data points, 2000–2030
Last refreshed

The Middle East and Central Asia Department Regional Economic Outlook (MCDREO) provides information on recent economic developments and prospects for 32 countries and territories: Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. These countries and territories are divided into two main nonoverlapping groups, based on export earnings, namely (1) oil exporters; and (2) oil importers. The oil importers group comprises (1) emerging market and middle-income countries (EM&MI) and (2) low-income countries (LICs) based on the income level. Additional analytical and regional groups might be used to provide a more granular breakdown for analysis and continuity.