Barbados vs China: Gross portfolio equity liabilities to GDP
Gross portfolio equity liabilities to GDP over time
- Barbados
- China
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 9.7% against 8.4% in China, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2008 it was China ahead.
Barbados ranks 39th and China ranks 41st of 121 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.4% | 6.6% | 5.2% | China |
| 2010s | 9.7% | 5.7% | 4.0% | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross portfolio equity liabilities to gdp, Barbados or China?
- Barbados, at 9.7% against 8.4% in China as of 2013.
- What is the difference in gross portfolio equity liabilities to gdp between Barbados and China?
- 1.3%, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2013.
- How do Barbados and China rank globally for gross portfolio equity liabilities to gdp?
- Barbados ranks 39th and China ranks 41st of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics (IFS), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Gross portfolio equity liabilities to GDP (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Ratio of gross portfolio equity liabilities to GDP. Equity liabilities include shares, stocks, participation, and similar documents (such as American depository receipts) that usually denote ownership of equity. Raw data are from the electronic version of the IMF's International Financial Statistics. IFS line 79LDDZF/ GDP. Local currency GDP is from IFS (line 99B..ZF or, if not available, line 99B.CZF).