Chile vs New Zealand: Independence and Accountability (IA)
Independence and Accountability (IA) over time
- Chile
- New Zealand
How they compare
Chile currently reports 104.44 against 104.35 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was New Zealand ahead.
Chile ranks 28th and New Zealand ranks 29th of 47 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 101.3 | 97.35 | 3.95 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher independence and accountability (ia), Chile or New Zealand?
- Chile, at 104.44 against 104.35 in New Zealand as of 2018.
- What is the difference in independence and accountability (ia) between Chile and New Zealand?
- 0.09, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for independence and accountability (ia)?
- Chile ranks 28th and New Zealand ranks 29th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Independence and Accountability (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).