China vs Georgia: Independence and Accountability (IA)

China
100
in 2018
Georgia
100.22
in 2018
China rank
42nd
Georgia rank
41st

Independence and Accountability (IA) over time

  • China
  • Georgia
0255075100200720122018

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 100.22 against 100 in China, a difference of 0.22.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2010 it was China ahead.

China ranks 42nd and Georgia ranks 41st of 47 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher independence and accountability (ia), China or Georgia?
Georgia, at 100.22 against 100 in China as of 2018.
What is the difference in independence and accountability (ia) between China and Georgia?
0.22, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Georgia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
How do China and Georgia rank globally for independence and accountability (ia)?
China ranks 42nd and Georgia ranks 41st of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Independence and Accountability (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Georgia: Independence and Accountability (IA). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/independence-and-accountability-ia-index/china/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/independence-and-accountability-ia-index/china/georgia/">China vs Georgia: Independence and Accountability (IA)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Independence and Accountability (IA) (Index)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 582 data points, 2007–2018
Last refreshed

Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).