China vs South Africa: Independence and Accountability (IA)
Independence and Accountability (IA) over time
- China
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 100.46 against 100 in China, a difference of 0.46.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was South Africa ahead.
China ranks 42nd and South Africa ranks 40th of 47 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 101.11 | 95.29 | 5.82 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher independence and accountability (ia), China or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 100.46 against 100 in China as of 2018.
- What is the difference in independence and accountability (ia) between China and South Africa?
- 0.46, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and South Africa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do China and South Africa rank globally for independence and accountability (ia)?
- China ranks 42nd and South Africa ranks 40th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Independence and Accountability (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).