Mexico vs New Zealand: Independence and Accountability (IA)
Independence and Accountability (IA) over time
- Mexico
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 104.35 against 103.7 in Mexico, a difference of 0.65.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was New Zealand ahead.
Mexico ranks 31st and New Zealand ranks 29th of 47 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 105.91 | 97.35 | 8.56 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher independence and accountability (ia), Mexico or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 104.35 against 103.7 in Mexico as of 2018.
- What is the difference in independence and accountability (ia) between Mexico and New Zealand?
- 0.65, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and New Zealand?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Mexico and New Zealand rank globally for independence and accountability (ia)?
- Mexico ranks 31st and New Zealand ranks 29th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Independence and Accountability (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).