Chile vs Papua New Guinea: Inflation, GDP deflator: linked series
Inflation, GDP deflator: linked series over time
- Chile
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 6.9% against 6.8% in Chile, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 45th and Papua New Guinea ranks 44th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.4% | 7.0% | 3.4% | Chile |
| 2000s | 5.2% | 6.4% | 1.2% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 3.9% | 4.3% | 0.3% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 7.4% | 5.7% | 1.8% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inflation, gdp deflator: linked series, Chile or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 6.9% against 6.8% in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in inflation, gdp deflator: linked series between Chile and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.1%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Papua New Guinea?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Papua New Guinea rank globally for inflation, gdp deflator: linked series?
- Chile ranks 45th and Papua New Guinea ranks 44th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Inflation, GDP deflator: linked series (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Inflation as measured by the annual growth rate of the GDP implicit deflator shows the rate of price change in the economy as a whole. The GDP implicit deflator is the ratio of GDP in current local currency to GDP in constant local currency. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.