Ecuador vs Philippines: Inflation, GDP deflator: linked series
Inflation, GDP deflator: linked series over time
- Ecuador
- Philippines
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 1.5% against 1.4% in Philippines, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Philippines ahead.
Ecuador ranks 164th and Philippines ranks 167th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.8% | 9.2% | 7.4% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 8.5% | 4.9% | 3.6% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 2.4% | 2.3% | 0.1% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 3.1% | 1.3% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inflation, gdp deflator: linked series, Ecuador or Philippines?
- Ecuador, at 1.5% against 1.4% in Philippines as of 2025.
- What is the difference in inflation, gdp deflator: linked series between Ecuador and Philippines?
- 0.1%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Philippines?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Philippines rank globally for inflation, gdp deflator: linked series?
- Ecuador ranks 164th and Philippines ranks 167th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Inflation, GDP deflator: linked series (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Inflation as measured by the annual growth rate of the GDP implicit deflator shows the rate of price change in the economy as a whole. The GDP implicit deflator is the ratio of GDP in current local currency to GDP in constant local currency. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.