French Polynesia vs Tuvalu: Inflation, GDP deflator: linked series
Inflation, GDP deflator: linked series over time
- French Polynesia
- Tuvalu
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 1.8% against 1.8% in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was French Polynesia ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 157th and Tuvalu ranks 158th of 212 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.1% | 3.5% | 0.4% | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | 2.0% | 4.0% | 1.9% | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 0.6% | 4.0% | 3.4% | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 1.9% | 4.0% | 2.1% | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inflation, gdp deflator: linked series, French Polynesia or Tuvalu?
- French Polynesia, at 1.8% against 1.8% in Tuvalu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in inflation, gdp deflator: linked series between French Polynesia and Tuvalu?
- 0.0%, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Tuvalu?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do French Polynesia and Tuvalu rank globally for inflation, gdp deflator: linked series?
- French Polynesia ranks 157th and Tuvalu ranks 158th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Inflation, GDP deflator: linked series (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Inflation as measured by the annual growth rate of the GDP implicit deflator shows the rate of price change in the economy as a whole. The GDP implicit deflator is the ratio of GDP in current local currency to GDP in constant local currency. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.