Latvia vs New Zealand: Inflation, GDP deflator: linked series
Inflation, GDP deflator: linked series over time
- Latvia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 3.6% against 3.6% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 94th and New Zealand ranks 95th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 137.7% | 1.4% | 136.3% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 6.7% | 2.7% | 4.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 2.2% | 2.3% | 0.0% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 5.4% | 4.1% | 1.3% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inflation, gdp deflator: linked series, Latvia or New Zealand?
- Latvia, at 3.6% against 3.6% in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in inflation, gdp deflator: linked series between Latvia and New Zealand?
- 0.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Zealand?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and New Zealand rank globally for inflation, gdp deflator: linked series?
- Latvia ranks 94th and New Zealand ranks 95th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Inflation, GDP deflator: linked series (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Inflation as measured by the annual growth rate of the GDP implicit deflator shows the rate of price change in the economy as a whole. The GDP implicit deflator is the ratio of GDP in current local currency to GDP in constant local currency. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.