Argentina vs Peru: Integrity of the Monetary Policymaking Body (IA)
Integrity of the Monetary Policymaking Body (IA) over time
- Argentina
- Peru
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 104.35 against 102.15 in Peru, a difference of 2.2.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Peru ahead.
Argentina ranks 22nd and Peru ranks 24th of 47 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 98.41 | 102.91 | 4.51 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher integrity of the monetary policymaking body (ia), Argentina or Peru?
- Argentina, at 104.35 against 102.15 in Peru as of 2018.
- What is the difference in integrity of the monetary policymaking body (ia) between Argentina and Peru?
- 2.2, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Peru?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Argentina and Peru rank globally for integrity of the monetary policymaking body (ia)?
- Argentina ranks 22nd and Peru ranks 24th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Integrity of the Monetary Policymaking Body (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).