Australia vs Norway: Integrity of the Monetary Policymaking Body (IA)
Integrity of the Monetary Policymaking Body (IA) over time
- Australia
- Norway
How they compare
Australia currently reports 102.15 against 102.15 in Norway, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Norway ahead.
Australia ranks 24th and Norway ranks 24th of 47 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 102.15 | 97.46 | 4.69 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher integrity of the monetary policymaking body (ia), Australia or Norway?
- Australia, at 102.15 against 102.15 in Norway as of 2018.
- What is the difference in integrity of the monetary policymaking body (ia) between Australia and Norway?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Norway?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Australia and Norway rank globally for integrity of the monetary policymaking body (ia)?
- Australia ranks 24th and Norway ranks 24th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Integrity of the Monetary Policymaking Body (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).