Peru vs South Africa: Integrity of the Monetary Policymaking Body (IA)
Integrity of the Monetary Policymaking Body (IA) over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 104.35 against 102.15 in Peru, a difference of 2.2.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 24th and South Africa ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 102.91 | 107.37 | 4.46 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher integrity of the monetary policymaking body (ia), Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 104.35 against 102.15 in Peru as of 2018.
- What is the difference in integrity of the monetary policymaking body (ia) between Peru and South Africa?
- 2.2, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for integrity of the monetary policymaking body (ia)?
- Peru ranks 24th and South Africa ranks 22nd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Integrity of the Monetary Policymaking Body (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).