Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Lending Rate, Percent per annum
Central African Republic
15
in 2007
Equatorial Guinea
15
in 2008
Central African Republic rank
30th
Equatorial Guinea rank
30th
Lending Rate, Percent per annum over time
- Central African Republic
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 15 against 15 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 30th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 30th of 144 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.89 | 19.34 | 0.45 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 18.08 | 18.08 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lending rate, percent per annum, Central African Republic or Equatorial Guinea?
- Central African Republic, at 15 against 15 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2007.
- What is the difference in lending rate, percent per annum between Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2007.
- How do Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for lending rate, percent per annum?
- Central African Republic ranks 30th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 30th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Lending Rate, Percent per annum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Monetary and Financial Statistics (MFS), Interest Rates dataset presents country-specific interest rate data across sectors and instruments, based on nationally defined methodologies.