Albania vs Zimbabwe: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Albania
49.0%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
48.2%
in 2021
Albania rank
45th
Zimbabwe rank
46th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Albania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Albania currently reports 49.0% against 48.2% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Albania ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 170 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.0% | 62.0% | 40.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 27.2% | 38.4% | 11.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 49.8% | 54.5% | 4.7% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Albania or Zimbabwe?
- Albania, at 49.0% against 48.2% in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Albania and Zimbabwe?
- 0.8%, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
- How do Albania and Zimbabwe rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Albania ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.