Armenia vs Macau, China: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Armenia
44.9%
in 2021
Macau, China
45.2%
in 2021
Armenia rank
56th
Macau, China rank
55th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Armenia
- Macau, China
How they compare
Macau, China currently reports 45.2% against 44.9% in Armenia, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Macau, China ahead.
Armenia ranks 56th and Macau, China ranks 55th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Macau, China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.4% | 50.6% | 1.8% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 34.8% | 36.5% | 1.7% | Macau, China |
| 2020s | 42.7% | 38.6% | 4.1% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Armenia or Macau, China?
- Macau, China, at 45.2% against 44.9% in Armenia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Armenia and Macau, China?
- 0.3%, with Macau, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Macau, China?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and Macau, China rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Armenia ranks 56th and Macau, China ranks 55th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.