Australia vs Malawi: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Australia
32.7%
in 2021
Malawi
32.0%
in 2021
Australia rank
102nd
Malawi rank
105th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Australia
- Malawi
How they compare
Australia currently reports 32.7% against 32.0% in Malawi, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Australia ranks 102nd and Malawi ranks 105th of 170 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.4% | 61.7% | 26.3% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 19.4% | 44.0% | 24.6% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 32.2% | 36.4% | 4.3% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Australia or Malawi?
- Australia, at 32.7% against 32.0% in Malawi as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Australia and Malawi?
- 0.7%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Malawi?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Australia and Malawi rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Australia ranks 102nd and Malawi ranks 105th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.