Australia vs Uzbekistan: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Australia
32.7%
in 2021
Uzbekistan
32.4%
in 2021
Australia rank
102nd
Uzbekistan rank
103rd
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Australia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Australia currently reports 32.7% against 32.4% in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Australia ranks 102nd and Uzbekistan ranks 103rd of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.4% | 43.6% | 8.2% | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 19.4% | 48.3% | 28.9% | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 32.2% | 32.1% | 0.1% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Australia or Uzbekistan?
- Australia, at 32.7% against 32.4% in Uzbekistan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Australia and Uzbekistan?
- 0.3%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uzbekistan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Australia and Uzbekistan rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Australia ranks 102nd and Uzbekistan ranks 103rd of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.