Barbados vs Costa Rica: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Barbados
38.9%
in 2021
Costa Rica
38.9%
in 2021
Barbados rank
75th
Costa Rica rank
76th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Barbados
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 38.9% against 38.9% in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 75th and Costa Rica ranks 76th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.0% | 16.4% | 0.6% | Barbados |
| 2010s | 16.2% | 18.0% | 1.7% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 35.4% | 36.5% | 1.0% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Barbados or Costa Rica?
- Barbados, at 38.9% against 38.9% in Costa Rica as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Barbados and Costa Rica?
- 0.0%, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Costa Rica?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Barbados and Costa Rica rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Barbados ranks 75th and Costa Rica ranks 76th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.