Belarus vs Singapore: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Belarus
28.9%
in 2021
Singapore
28.9%
in 2021
Belarus rank
120th
Singapore rank
121st
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Belarus
- Singapore
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 28.9% against 28.9% in Singapore, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Singapore ahead.
Belarus ranks 120th and Singapore ranks 121st of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.5% | 45.3% | 11.8% | Singapore |
| 2010s | 26.8% | 25.3% | 1.6% | Belarus |
| 2020s | 28.1% | 29.9% | 1.8% | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Belarus or Singapore?
- Belarus, at 28.9% against 28.9% in Singapore as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Belarus and Singapore?
- 0.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Singapore?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Belarus and Singapore rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Belarus ranks 120th and Singapore ranks 121st of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.