Bolivia vs Oman: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%)
Bolivia
22.5%
in 2021
Oman
22.4%
in 2021
Bolivia rank
140th
Oman rank
142nd
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%) over time
- Bolivia
- Oman
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 22.5% against 22.4% in Oman, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Oman ahead.
Bolivia ranks 140th and Oman ranks 142nd of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 2 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.4% | 29.7% | 16.3% | Oman |
| 2010s | 23.1% | 22.4% | 0.7% | Bolivia |
| 2020s | 21.9% | 20.9% | 0.9% | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Bolivia or Oman?
- Bolivia, at 22.5% against 22.4% in Oman as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Bolivia and Oman?
- 0.1%, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Oman?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Bolivia and Oman rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Bolivia ranks 140th and Oman ranks 142nd of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.