Botswana vs Malawi: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Botswana
31.9%
in 2021
Malawi
32.0%
in 2021
Botswana rank
107th
Malawi rank
105th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Botswana
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 32.0% against 31.9% in Botswana, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 107th and Malawi ranks 105th of 170 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.4% | 62.4% | 35.0% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 25.8% | 44.0% | 18.2% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 29.5% | 36.4% | 6.9% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Botswana or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 32.0% against 31.9% in Botswana as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Botswana and Malawi?
- 0.1%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Malawi?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Botswana and Malawi rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Botswana ranks 107th and Malawi ranks 105th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.