China vs Ecuador: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
China
18.9%
in 2021
Ecuador
19.1%
in 2021
China rank
152nd
Ecuador rank
150th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- China
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 19.1% against 18.9% in China, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China ahead.
China ranks 152nd and Ecuador ranks 150th of 170 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.1% | 31.3% | 10.1% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 18.3% | 23.5% | 5.2% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 19.3% | 20.2% | 0.9% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, China or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 19.1% against 18.9% in China as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between China and Ecuador?
- 0.2%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Ecuador?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do China and Ecuador rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- China ranks 152nd and Ecuador ranks 150th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.