Croatia vs Macao: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%)
Croatia
44.6%
in 2021
Macao
45.2%
in 2021
Croatia rank
57th
Macao rank
55th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%) over time
- Croatia
- Macao
How they compare
Macao currently reports 45.2% against 44.6% in Croatia, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Macao ahead.
Croatia ranks 57th and Macao ranks 55th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Macao in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.4% | 50.6% | 6.2% | Macao |
| 2010s | 25.7% | 36.5% | 10.8% | Macao |
| 2020s | 43.4% | 38.6% | 4.9% | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Croatia or Macao?
- Macao, at 45.2% against 44.6% in Croatia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Croatia and Macao?
- 0.6%, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Macao?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Croatia and Macao rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Croatia ranks 57th and Macao ranks 55th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.