Curaçao vs Mozambique: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Curaçao
42.9%
in 2021
Mozambique
44.4%
in 2021
Curaçao rank
60th
Mozambique rank
58th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Curaçao
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 44.4% against 42.9% in Curaçao, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mozambique ahead.
Curaçao ranks 60th and Mozambique ranks 58th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Curaçao averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curaçao | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.0% | 58.8% | 21.9% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 41.4% | 34.0% | 7.4% | Curaçao |
| 2020s | 41.1% | 47.7% | 6.6% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Curaçao or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 44.4% against 42.9% in Curaçao as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Curaçao and Mozambique?
- 1.5%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Mozambique?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Curaçao and Mozambique rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Curaçao ranks 60th and Mozambique ranks 58th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.