Georgia vs Oman: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Georgia
21.3%
in 2021
Oman
22.4%
in 2021
Georgia rank
143rd
Oman rank
142nd
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Georgia
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 22.4% against 21.3% in Georgia, a difference of 1.1%.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 143rd and Oman ranks 142nd of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.8% | 29.7% | 13.1% | Georgia |
| 2010s | 20.8% | 22.4% | 1.6% | Oman |
| 2020s | 21.8% | 20.9% | 0.9% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Georgia or Oman?
- Oman, at 22.4% against 21.3% in Georgia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Georgia and Oman?
- 1.1%, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Oman?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Oman rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Georgia ranks 143rd and Oman ranks 142nd of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.