Hong Kong vs Lesotho: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%)
Hong Kong
50.9%
in 2021
Lesotho
50.5%
in 2021
Hong Kong rank
39th
Lesotho rank
40th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%) over time
- Hong Kong
- Lesotho
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 50.9% against 50.5% in Lesotho, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lesotho ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 39th and Lesotho ranks 40th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.2% | 88.0% | 57.8% | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 34.1% | 58.5% | 24.3% | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 51.4% | 47.4% | 4.0% | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Hong Kong or Lesotho?
- Hong Kong, at 50.9% against 50.5% in Lesotho as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Hong Kong and Lesotho?
- 0.4%, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Lesotho?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Hong Kong and Lesotho rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Hong Kong ranks 39th and Lesotho ranks 40th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.