What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Hong Kong, China and Uruguay?

1.3%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Uruguay?

22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong, China vs Uruguay: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding

Hong Kong, China

50.9%

in 2021

Uruguay

49.6%

in 2021

Hong Kong, China rank

39th

Uruguay rank

41st

Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time

Hong Kong, China
Uruguay

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 50.9% against 49.6% in Uruguay, a difference of 1.3%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uruguay ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 39th and Uruguay ranks 41st of 170 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong, China	Uruguay	Difference	Ahead
2000s	33.4%	51.4%	18.0%	Uruguay
2010s	34.1%	50.4%	16.3%	Uruguay
2020s	51.4%	50.8%	0.7%	Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Hong Kong, China or Uruguay?: Hong Kong, China, at 50.9% against 49.6% in Uruguay as of 2021.
What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Hong Kong, China and Uruguay?: 1.3%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Uruguay?: 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong, China and Uruguay rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?: Hong Kong, China ranks 39th and Uruguay ranks 41st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Uruguay: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding. Statizoid, drawing on Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-assets-to-deposits-and-short-term-funding-percent/hong-kong-sar-china/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-assets-to-deposits-and-short-term-funding-percent/hong-kong-sar-china/uruguay/">Hong Kong, China vs Uruguay: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%)
Unit: %
Source: Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 170 places, 3,231 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.