Jordan vs South Africa: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Jordan
27.7%
in 2021
South Africa
26.3%
in 2021
Jordan rank
125th
South Africa rank
127th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Jordan
- South Africa
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 27.7% against 26.3% in South Africa, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 125th and South Africa ranks 127th of 170 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.2% | 15.1% | 30.1% | Jordan |
| 2010s | 29.9% | 21.1% | 8.8% | Jordan |
| 2020s | 28.0% | 25.1% | 2.9% | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Jordan or South Africa?
- Jordan, at 27.7% against 26.3% in South Africa as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Jordan and South Africa?
- 1.4%, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and South Africa?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Jordan and South Africa rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Jordan ranks 125th and South Africa ranks 127th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.