Latvia vs Nicaragua: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Latvia
47.4%
in 2021
Nicaragua
48.0%
in 2021
Latvia rank
49th
Nicaragua rank
48th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Latvia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 48.0% against 47.4% in Latvia, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 49th and Nicaragua ranks 48th of 170 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.6% | 25.0% | 11.6% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 42.1% | 30.1% | 12.0% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 49.6% | 47.4% | 2.1% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Latvia or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 48.0% against 47.4% in Latvia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 0.6%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Latvia and Nicaragua rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Latvia ranks 49th and Nicaragua ranks 48th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.