Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Latvia
47.4%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
48.2%
in 2021
Latvia rank
49th
Zimbabwe rank
46th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Latvia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 48.2% against 47.4% in Latvia, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Latvia ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.9% | 62.0% | 25.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 42.1% | 38.4% | 3.8% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 49.6% | 54.5% | 5.0% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Latvia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 48.2% against 47.4% in Latvia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.8%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
- How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Latvia ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.