Libya vs Myanmar: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Libya
92.3%
in 2020
Myanmar
88.7%
in 2014
Libya rank
4th
Myanmar rank
5th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Libya
- Myanmar
How they compare
Libya currently reports 92.3% against 88.7% in Myanmar, a difference of 3.6%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 4th and Myanmar ranks 5th of 170 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.5% | 70.9% | 19.6% | Libya |
| 2010s | 97.5% | 74.0% | 23.5% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Libya or Myanmar?
- Libya, at 92.3% against 88.7% in Myanmar as of 2020.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Libya and Myanmar?
- 3.6%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Myanmar?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Libya and Myanmar rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Libya ranks 4th and Myanmar ranks 5th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.