Libya vs South Sudan: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Libya
92.3%
in 2020
South Sudan
108.3%
in 2019
Libya rank
4th
South Sudan rank
2nd
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Libya
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 108.3% against 92.3% in Libya, a difference of 16.0%.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 4th and South Sudan ranks 2nd of 170 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.2% | 91.7% | 8.5% | Libya |
| 2010s | 98.5% | 81.4% | 17.1% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Libya or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 108.3% against 92.3% in Libya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Libya and South Sudan?
- 16.0%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and South Sudan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Libya and South Sudan rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Libya ranks 4th and South Sudan ranks 2nd of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.