Macau, China vs Uganda: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Macau, China
45.2%
in 2021
Uganda
45.3%
in 2021
Macau, China rank
55th
Uganda rank
52nd
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Macau, China
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 45.3% against 45.2% in Macau, China, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Macau, China ahead.
Macau, China ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 52nd of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Macau, China averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macau, China | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.6% | 48.8% | 1.8% | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 36.5% | 34.7% | 1.8% | Macau, China |
| 2020s | 38.6% | 45.0% | 6.4% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Macau, China or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 45.3% against 45.2% in Macau, China as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Macau, China and Uganda?
- 0.1%, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Uganda?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Macau, China and Uganda rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Macau, China ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 52nd of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.