What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Macau, China and United Arab Emirates?

0.0%, with United Arab Emirates ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and United Arab Emirates?

22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Macau, China vs United Arab Emirates: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding

Macau, China

45.2%

in 2021

United Arab Emirates

45.2%

in 2021

Macau, China rank

55th

United Arab Emirates rank

54th

Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time

Macau, China
United Arab Emirates

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 45.2% against 45.2% in Macau, China, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Macau, China ahead.

Macau, China ranks 55th and United Arab Emirates ranks 54th of 170 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Macau, China averaged higher in 2 and United Arab Emirates in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Macau, China	United Arab Emirates	Difference	Ahead
2000s	50.6%	32.0%	18.6%	Macau, China
2010s	36.5%	27.8%	8.7%	Macau, China
2020s	38.6%	45.3%	6.7%	United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Macau, China or United Arab Emirates?: United Arab Emirates, at 45.2% against 45.2% in Macau, China as of 2021.
What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Macau, China and United Arab Emirates?: 0.0%, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and United Arab Emirates?: 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Macau, China and United Arab Emirates rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?: Macau, China ranks 55th and United Arab Emirates ranks 54th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs United Arab Emirates: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding. Statizoid, drawing on Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-assets-to-deposits-and-short-term-funding-percent/macao-sar-china/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-assets-to-deposits-and-short-term-funding-percent/macao-sar-china/united-arab-emirates/">Macau, China vs United Arab Emirates: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%)
Unit: %
Source: Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 170 places, 3,231 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.