Malawi vs Uzbekistan: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Malawi
32.0%
in 2021
Uzbekistan
32.4%
in 2021
Malawi rank
105th
Uzbekistan rank
103rd
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Malawi
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 32.4% against 32.0% in Malawi, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 105th and Uzbekistan ranks 103rd of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.4% | 44.8% | 17.6% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 44.0% | 48.3% | 4.3% | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 36.4% | 32.1% | 4.4% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Malawi or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 32.4% against 32.0% in Malawi as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Malawi and Uzbekistan?
- 0.4%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uzbekistan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Malawi and Uzbekistan rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Malawi ranks 105th and Uzbekistan ranks 103rd of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.