What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Mauritius and United Kingdom?

1.2%, with United Kingdom ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and United Kingdom?

22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mauritius vs United Kingdom: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%)

Mauritius

56.8%

in 2021

United Kingdom

58.0%

in 2021

Mauritius rank

25th

United Kingdom rank

24th

Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%) over time

Mauritius
United Kingdom

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 58.0% against 56.8% in Mauritius, a difference of 1.2%.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Mauritius ranks 25th and United Kingdom ranks 24th of 170 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mauritius	United Kingdom	Difference	Ahead
2000s	37.3%	50.0%	12.8%	United Kingdom
2010s	42.5%	51.2%	8.7%	United Kingdom
2020s	55.5%	57.7%	2.2%	United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Mauritius or United Kingdom?: United Kingdom, at 58.0% against 56.8% in Mauritius as of 2021.
What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Mauritius and United Kingdom?: 1.2%, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and United Kingdom?: 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Mauritius and United Kingdom rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?: Mauritius ranks 25th and United Kingdom ranks 24th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs United Kingdom: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding. Statizoid, drawing on Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-assets-to-deposits-and-short-term-funding-percent/mauritius/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-assets-to-deposits-and-short-term-funding-percent/mauritius/united-kingdom/">Mauritius vs United Kingdom: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%)
Unit: %
Source: Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 170 places, 3,231 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed: 30 October 2026

Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.