Mongolia vs Zambia: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Mongolia
48.0%
in 2021
Zambia
49.0%
in 2021
Mongolia rank
47th
Zambia rank
44th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Mongolia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 49.0% against 48.0% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 47th and Zambia ranks 44th of 170 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.3% | 52.1% | 14.9% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 28.8% | 39.8% | 11.1% | Zambia |
| 2020s | 46.8% | 52.4% | 5.6% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Mongolia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 49.0% against 48.0% in Mongolia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Mongolia and Zambia?
- 1.0%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Zambia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Mongolia and Zambia rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Mongolia ranks 47th and Zambia ranks 44th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.