Mongolia vs Zimbabwe: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Mongolia
48.0%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
48.2%
in 2021
Mongolia rank
47th
Zimbabwe rank
46th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Mongolia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 48.2% against 48.0% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 170 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.1% | 62.0% | 22.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 28.8% | 38.7% | 9.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 46.8% | 54.5% | 7.8% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Mongolia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 48.2% against 48.0% in Mongolia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Mongolia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.2%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
- How do Mongolia and Zimbabwe rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Mongolia ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.