Nicaragua vs Zimbabwe: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Nicaragua
48.0%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
48.2%
in 2021
Nicaragua rank
48th
Zimbabwe rank
46th
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Nicaragua
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 48.2% against 48.0% in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 170 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.6% | 62.0% | 22.5% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 30.1% | 38.4% | 8.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 47.4% | 54.5% | 7.1% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Nicaragua or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 48.2% against 48.0% in Nicaragua as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Nicaragua and Zimbabwe?
- 0.2%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
- How do Nicaragua and Zimbabwe rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Nicaragua ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.