How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Tanzania, United Republic of?

18 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Peru vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding

Peru

24.8%

in 2021

Tanzania, United Republic of

24.3%

in 2021

Peru rank

131st

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

133rd

Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time

Peru
Tanzania, United Republic of

How they compare

Peru currently reports 24.8% against 24.3% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.5%.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Peru ranks 131st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 133rd of 170 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Peru	Tanzania, United Republic of	Difference	Ahead
2000s	25.5%	57.5%	31.9%	Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s	30.6%	27.1%	3.4%	Peru
2020s	27.0%	24.8%	2.3%	Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Peru or Tanzania, United Republic of?: Peru, at 24.8% against 24.3% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2021.
What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Peru and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 0.5%, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2021.
How do Peru and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?: Peru ranks 131st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 133rd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding. Statizoid, drawing on Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-assets-to-deposits-and-short-term-funding-percent/peru/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-assets-to-deposits-and-short-term-funding-percent/peru/tanzania/">Peru vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%)
Unit: %
Source: Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 170 places, 3,231 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.