Singapore vs Chinese Taipei: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Singapore
28.9%
in 2021
Chinese Taipei
28.6%
in 2021
Singapore rank
121st
Chinese Taipei rank
122nd
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Singapore
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 28.9% against 28.6% in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Singapore ranks 121st and Chinese Taipei ranks 122nd of 170 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.0% | 12.8% | 38.2% | Singapore |
| 2010s | 24.4% | 21.4% | 3.0% | Singapore |
| 2020s | 29.9% | 29.0% | 0.9% | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Singapore or Chinese Taipei?
- Singapore, at 28.9% against 28.6% in Chinese Taipei as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Singapore and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.3%, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Chinese Taipei?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Singapore and Chinese Taipei rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Singapore ranks 121st and Chinese Taipei ranks 122nd of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.