Slovenia vs Sudan: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding
Slovenia
35.4%
in 2021
Sudan
35.3%
in 2012
Slovenia rank
91st
Sudan rank
93rd
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time
- Slovenia
- Sudan
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 35.4% against 35.3% in Sudan, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Slovenia ranks 91st and Sudan ranks 93rd of 170 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.1% | 75.7% | 39.6% | Sudan |
| 2010s | 8.5% | 36.7% | 28.3% | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Slovenia or Sudan?
- Slovenia, at 35.4% against 35.3% in Sudan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Slovenia and Sudan?
- 0.1%, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2012.
- How do Slovenia and Sudan rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
- Slovenia ranks 91st and Sudan ranks 93rd of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.