Tanzania, United Republic of vs United States of America: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding

Tanzania, United Republic of
24.3%
in 2021
United States of America
23.7%
in 2021
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
133rd
United States of America rank
134th

Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • United States of America
20406080200020102021

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 24.3% against 23.7% in United States of America, a difference of 0.6%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 133rd and United States of America ranks 134th of 170 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of United States of America Difference Ahead
2000s 57.5% 20.8% 36.7% Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 27.1% 19.9% 7.3% Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 24.8% 24.2% 0.6% Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher liquid assets to deposits and short term funding, Tanzania, United Republic of or United States of America?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 24.3% against 23.7% in United States of America as of 2021.
What is the difference in liquid assets to deposits and short term funding between Tanzania, United Republic of and United States of America?
0.6%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and United States of America?
18 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2021.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and United States of America rank globally for liquid assets to deposits and short term funding?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 133rd and United States of America ranks 134th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs United States of America: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding. Statizoid, drawing on Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-assets-to-deposits-and-short-term-funding-percent/tanzania/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-assets-to-deposits-and-short-term-funding-percent/tanzania/united-states/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs United States of America: Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Liquid assets to deposits and short term funding (%)
Unit
%
Source
Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
170 places, 3,231 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2075 / data2030. Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.