Chile vs Mexico: Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square

Chile
0.1773 2000 constant per square kilometre
in 2021
Mexico
0.1803 2000 constant per square kilometre
in 2021
Chile rank
96th
Mexico rank
93rd

Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square over time

  • Chile
  • Mexico
00.050.10.150.2196119912021

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 0.1803 2000 constant per square kilometre against 0.1773 2000 constant per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.003 2000 constant per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Chile ranks 96th and Mexico ranks 93rd of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0064 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0199 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0136 2000 constant per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 0.0087 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0465 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0379 2000 constant per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0.0224 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0438 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0214 2000 constant per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 0.0463 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0758 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0295 2000 constant per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 0.0651 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.1181 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0529 2000 constant per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 0.1549 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.159 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0041 2000 constant per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 0.1869 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.182 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0049 2000 constant per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square, Chile or Mexico?
Mexico, at 0.1803 2000 constant per square kilometre against 0.1773 2000 constant per square kilometre in Chile as of 2021.
What is the difference in liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square between Chile and Mexico?
0.003 2000 constant per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mexico?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2021.
How do Chile and Mexico rank globally for liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square?
Chile ranks 96th and Mexico ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mexico: Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-liabilities-in-millions-usd-2000-constant-per-square-kilometre/chile/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-liabilities-in-millions-usd-2000-constant-per-square-kilometre/chile/mexico/">Chile vs Mexico: Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square kilometre
Unit
2000 constant per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 8,613 data points, 1961–2021
Last refreshed

Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.