Iceland vs Pakistan: Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square

Iceland
0.1401 2000 constant per square kilometre
in 2021
Pakistan
0.1428 2000 constant per square kilometre
in 2021
Iceland rank
110th
Pakistan rank
109th

Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square over time

  • Iceland
  • Pakistan
00.050.10.150.2196119912021

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.1428 2000 constant per square kilometre against 0.1401 2000 constant per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0027 2000 constant per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Iceland ranks 110th and Pakistan ranks 109th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.01 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0231 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0132 2000 constant per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 0.0147 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.026 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0113 2000 constant per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 0.0191 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.033 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0139 2000 constant per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 0.0392 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0421 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.003 2000 constant per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 0.1094 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0698 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0397 2000 constant per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.1279 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.1223 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0056 2000 constant per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.1394 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.1452 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.0059 2000 constant per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square, Iceland or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 0.1428 2000 constant per square kilometre against 0.1401 2000 constant per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2021.
What is the difference in liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square between Iceland and Pakistan?
0.0027 2000 constant per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Pakistan?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2021.
How do Iceland and Pakistan rank globally for liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square?
Iceland ranks 110th and Pakistan ranks 109th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Pakistan: Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-liabilities-in-millions-usd-2000-constant-per-square-kilometre/iceland/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-liabilities-in-millions-usd-2000-constant-per-square-kilometre/iceland/pakistan/">Iceland vs Pakistan: Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square kilometre
Unit
2000 constant per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 8,613 data points, 1961–2021
Last refreshed

Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.