Japan vs Netherlands: Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square

Japan
29.36 2000 constant per square kilometre
in 2021
Netherlands
28.25 2000 constant per square kilometre
in 2021
Japan rank
7th
Netherlands rank
9th

Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square over time

  • Japan
  • Netherlands
010203040196119912021

How they compare

Japan currently reports 29.36 2000 constant per square kilometre against 28.25 2000 constant per square kilometre in Netherlands, a difference of 1.11 2000 constant per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Netherlands ahead.

Japan ranks 7th and Netherlands ranks 9th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 6 and Netherlands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Netherlands Difference Ahead
1960s 1.32 2000 constant per square kilometre 2.36 2000 constant per square kilometre 1.04 2000 constant per square kilometre Netherlands
1970s 7.43 2000 constant per square kilometre 6.45 2000 constant per square kilometre 0.9791 2000 constant per square kilometre Japan
1980s 17.48 2000 constant per square kilometre 8.15 2000 constant per square kilometre 9.34 2000 constant per square kilometre Japan
1990s 34.59 2000 constant per square kilometre 11.36 2000 constant per square kilometre 23.24 2000 constant per square kilometre Japan
2000s 28.37 2000 constant per square kilometre 22.8 2000 constant per square kilometre 5.57 2000 constant per square kilometre Japan
2010s 29 2000 constant per square kilometre 26.75 2000 constant per square kilometre 2.25 2000 constant per square kilometre Japan
2020s 31.55 2000 constant per square kilometre 29.19 2000 constant per square kilometre 2.36 2000 constant per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square, Japan or Netherlands?
Japan, at 29.36 2000 constant per square kilometre against 28.25 2000 constant per square kilometre in Netherlands as of 2021.
What is the difference in liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square between Japan and Netherlands?
1.11 2000 constant per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Netherlands?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2021.
How do Japan and Netherlands rank globally for liquid liabilities in millions usd (2000 constant), per square?
Japan ranks 7th and Netherlands ranks 9th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Netherlands: Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-liabilities-in-millions-usd-2000-constant-per-square-kilometre/japan/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/liquid-liabilities-in-millions-usd-2000-constant-per-square-kilometre/japan/netherlands/">Japan vs Netherlands: Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant), per square kilometre
Unit
2000 constant per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 8,613 data points, 1961–2021
Last refreshed

Liquid liabilities in millions USD (2000 constant) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.