Israel vs Japan: Mandated Goals and Numerical Targets (IA)
Mandated Goals and Numerical Targets (IA) over time
- Israel
- Japan
How they compare
Israel currently reports 194.77 against 123.16 in Japan, a difference of 71.61.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.6 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Japan ahead.
Israel ranks 2nd and Japan ranks 5th of 47 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 192.12 | 115.44 | 76.68 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mandated goals and numerical targets (ia), Israel or Japan?
- Israel, at 194.77 against 123.16 in Japan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mandated goals and numerical targets (ia) between Israel and Japan?
- 71.61, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Japan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Israel and Japan rank globally for mandated goals and numerical targets (ia)?
- Israel ranks 2nd and Japan ranks 5th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Mandated Goals and Numerical Targets (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).