Japan vs Uruguay: Mandated Goals and Numerical Targets (IA)
Mandated Goals and Numerical Targets (IA) over time
- Japan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 179.2 against 123.16 in Japan, a difference of 56.04.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.5 times Japan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 5th and Uruguay ranks 3rd of 47 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 115.44 | 163.55 | 48.11 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mandated goals and numerical targets (ia), Japan or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 179.2 against 123.16 in Japan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mandated goals and numerical targets (ia) between Japan and Uruguay?
- 56.04, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Japan and Uruguay rank globally for mandated goals and numerical targets (ia)?
- Japan ranks 5th and Uruguay ranks 3rd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Mandated Goals and Numerical Targets (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).