Armenia vs Latvia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Armenia
5.08 billion
in 2025
Latvia
5.44 billion
in 2025
Armenia rank
75th
Latvia rank
73rd

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Armenia
  • Latvia
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B200020122025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 5.44 billion against 5.08 billion in Armenia, a difference of 368.72 million.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Latvia ahead.

Armenia ranks 75th and Latvia ranks 73rd of 86 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 1.12 billion 3.91 billion 2.79 billion Latvia
2010s 2.07 billion 4.77 billion 2.69 billion Latvia
2020s 3.71 billion 4.73 billion 1.02 billion Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Armenia or Latvia?
Latvia, at 5.44 billion against 5.08 billion in Armenia as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Armenia and Latvia?
368.72 million, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Latvia?
23 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2025.
How do Armenia and Latvia rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Armenia ranks 75th and Latvia ranks 73rd of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Latvia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-in-sdr-basket/armenia/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-in-sdr-basket/armenia/latvia/">Armenia vs Latvia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
88 places, 1,785 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.